Thursday, June 9, 2011

wwe divas maryse hot

images Former WWE Diva Maria Modeling wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Maria Kanellis
  • WWE Diva Maria Kanellis


  • dpsg
    03-28 05:48 PM
    I agree although absolute aim is getting GC , But It is too vague to put as a clearly defined objective.

    Whereas asking for "current Priority Date for every category above EB3" clearly defines our goal.I think categories below EB3 is beyond the scope of this forum.
    It is more complicated/different and there are forums which knows the issues clearly and are adressing them




    wallpaper WWE Diva Maria Kanellis wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Maryse Photoshoot;
  • WWE Diva Maryse Photoshoot;


  • dtekkedil
    07-02 05:20 PM
    Hello Folks,

    We have all been victims of a cruel joke played by DOS and USCIS! We should not stand by and do nothing!

    We should call the new organizations and let them know... make sure that they cover this fisco!

    But, I want to see this issue in the news not just for a day or two. The one thing that will catch people's attention is we do something OUT of the way!

    I support one suggestion put forward by one of our members - Go the Munnabhai way! Send them flowers! Do you guy have any idea what kind of news that will be? If USCIS suddenly receive 1000s of flowers everyday? Granted we will be spending money from our pockets but that is a small price to pay to make our woes known to others!


    So, if people are interested... let us start a send a flower a day campaign!




    wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Terri Runnels Giving
  • WWE Diva Terri Runnels Giving


  • ssnd03
    03-04 02:57 PM
    Finally some sanity on FBI Namecheck from the DHS head honcho Michael Chertoff. He is now saying things which everybody has been screaming for the last three four years. I have highlighted those. But it does take that long for wheels to turn even in the most liberal democracy.



    Question: Mr. Secretary, you had, at the very beginning, laid out some great progress that's been made in terms of preventing bad people from getting in. And part of the Homeland Security mission, which is a challenging one, is that while you are responsible for protecting against bad things, you're also responsible for facilitating good things. And be that the flow of people, in this case, USCIS is responsible for that for the department. They've begun a $3.5 billion transformation. And I'm hoping you could speak to that in two ways. What's your concept of success in that, in terms of the national security part of it, the operational excellence part of it, and customer service part of it?



    Secretary Chertoff: Three -- two main things. One is, we have to move from a paper-based system to a totally electronically-based system. We still have too much paper, and it's hard to track, it's hard to manage, and it takes a lot of time.



    The second piece is, I want to rebuild -- re-engineer the system in a couple of ways. One is, and the most urgent, is to deal with the background check problem. It just takes way too long for the Bureau to complete background checks for a small but a significant number of people. The majority of people -- you know, if the name doesn't pop up on anything in the -- it's pretty quick. But for a small number -- but still significant, and certainly to the individual, significant -- if their name crops up and it's an older case, and it's in a file somewhere, someone has got to hunt it down. And to be perfectly honest, that is not a top priority job for an agent, is to go through an old paper record sitting in a warehouse.



    Looking forward as we go electronically, and as the Bureau goes electronically, that problem will diminish. But looking backwards we have to re-engineer the system to be a little tougher. And one of the things we did, for example, with the green cards was we said, for background checks that took longer than six months, we would give you a green card, and then if it turned out the background check later revealed a problem, we would take the green card away.



    Now why did we do that -- because I got criticized, �Oh, you're sacrificing national security.� Here's why. First of all, if you haven't been -- if it's going to take longer than six months, it's clear that you're not on a Terrorist Watch List, you haven't been convicted of a crime, you haven't been indicted for a crime. In other words, most of the major things you would worry about -- it's a very easy thing to determine whether you've had a problem or not. What you're not going to get in that six months is the guy whose name came up in a file somewhere. And the vast majority of those are benign mentions.



    Secondly, you're here. If you're going to do something bad, you're still here legally. The green card -- it's not like we're bringing you in from overseas. So if you think about it logically, the risk of giving you the green card with the understanding that it can be pulled away if something turns up, it's a minimal risk. It's a minimal, marginal risk. Whereas the customer service value of giving someone the green card is high. That's an example of trying to be more cost-benefit in the system.

    See
    http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=24818




    2011 WWE Diva Maryse Photoshoot; wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Divas - Maria Maryse
  • WWE Divas - Maria Maryse


  • kate123
    09-24 02:01 PM
    excellent.. if this happens!!!!

    The green side of the story is, USCIS will try to attract new applications. For this DOS need to move the dates further.
    OR
    Introduce a new process of filing 485 for administrative processing (which is in talks) even before your PD is current as per visa bulletin as soon as 140 approval.

    I see this good for people waiting to file for 485.



    more...

    wwe divas maryse hot. WWE DIVA MARIA KANELLIS HOT N
  • WWE DIVA MARIA KANELLIS HOT N


  • small2006
    07-22 06:18 PM
    Yesterday, I received one more appointment notice for a different day (one day after the original appointment). This is in addition to the appointment notice that I had received earlier.

    Has this happened to anybody before? Is it just a mistake on the part of USCIS? I am planning on going there as per the first notice.

    Any ideas from anybody?




    wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Maryse Picture
  • WWE Diva Maryse Picture


  • s416504
    11-17 10:40 AM
    Your reply looks OK except your lawyer's suggestion to inform employer about parole status. I don't mind informing employer but the Question is "Is that mandatory to inform employer ?" I think Lawyer's intention could be we need to inform employer (as well as lawyer ) about AP during applying next H1B extention.

    Thanks...

    Here you go:

    If you use AP to reenter, you will no long in H1B status, and you will be a "parolee", but you may still work under the authorization of the original H1B term for the same employer; at the end of the period, you may apply to extend the H1B and then you will get your H1B status back....Sounds not logical, but this is current the CIS interpretation of the regulation.

    If you lose H1B, your dependent may no longer on H4; you may keep working for same firm without using EAD until the end of current H1B but you need let employer know that you enter with AP.

    Please consult a immigration lawyer and get clarification, above is the reply I got from my lawyer when I told him about using AP while re-entering US.



    more...

    wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Maryse Ouellet out of
  • WWE Diva Maryse Ouellet out of


  • hpandey
    01-02 02:16 PM
    Hi Everybody,

    I know that nobody has an answer for my question, but still i would like to get the views/inputs from the seniors here , who have experience with USCIS.

    When do you think a person with PD of Nov 2007 ,EB3 from India, would be able to file for 485??

    As Lacrosse said most probably 3-4 years but you never know .. you can get lucky like this year when USCIS made everything current for July . If a month like that comes along then you would be able to file for AOS .

    A miracle can happen but if it doesn't your wait time could be anything from 3 - 5 years or




    2010 WWE Diva Terri Runnels Giving wwe divas maryse hot. Former WWE Diva Maria Modeling
  • Former WWE Diva Maria Modeling


  • jthomas
    07-05 01:50 PM
    Which part of CA are you in? Is it scary to live there. Do you really need a gun?

    I live in Southern california(also lived in LA/Orange/San diego area) and i guess you are not in Southern california.

    J Thomas



    more...

    wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Maryse Graces the
  • WWE Diva Maryse Graces the


  • Ann Ruben
    06-22 12:10 PM
    There are really two questions here. First, are you eligible for unemployment compensation? And second, will applying for unemployment compensation adversely impact your application for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident?


    The answer to the first question is controlled by the law of the particular state in which you worked and/or reside. In theory, to be eligible one must have worked long enough that an adequate amount of UC insurance was paid into the UC system, AND one must be willing and ABLE to accept new employment. The law varies from state to state with respect to whether someone in your situation qualifies as "ABLE" to accept new employment.

    As to the second question, (assuming your I-140 has been approved and your I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days) under the INA, when your PD is reached and your I-485 is adjudicated, you are required to have the intention to take up an offer of permanent full time employment in the same or similar occupation for which your LC was granted. This is a prospective requirement, and your employment status prior to the actual grant of AOS is relevant only to the extent that it supports or undercuts your ability to prove that you have an appropriate offer of full time employment which you intend to take up. There is no requirement that you be employed while you are waiting for your priority date to become current and your I-485 to be adjudicated. However, being unemployed or employed in an entirely unrelated occupation could trigger USCIS to perform a more searching inquiry into the bona fides of the prospective AC21 qualifying job offer and your intention to accept it.

    To the best of my knowledge, USCIS is not notified when an AOS applicant applies for UC. Similarly, I am not aware of any cases where an UC claim triggered an RFE. Nevertheless, it would be prudent to act on the assumption that USCIS is aware of UC claims and be well prepared to prove one's intention to take up a bona fide offer of AC 21 qualifying employment once your PD is reached.




    hair WWE Divas - Maria Maryse wwe divas maryse hot. Maryse WWE Daily Diva – August
  • Maryse WWE Daily Diva – August


  • sush
    08-21 11:33 AM
    not sure which center my attorney filed through but on the back of the check, it mentioned St. Paul MN



    more...

    wwe divas maryse hot. WWE Diva Maryse Picture - pic
  • WWE Diva Maryse Picture - pic


  • larmani
    04-29 01:50 PM
    Did you already applied for H1 extention and got RFE or you are just assuming you might get RFE. I recently applied extention for another 3 years and got it successfully. Our AOS is also pending. So dont worry. Anyway it is you choice to use EAD and extend every year.




    hot WWE DIVA MARIA KANELLIS HOT N wwe divas maryse hot. Hot WWE Diva Focus Maryse
  • Hot WWE Diva Focus Maryse


  • zephyrr
    03-20 11:56 PM
    Question 11. When is an I-140 no longer valid for porting purposes?
    Answer: An I-140 is no longer valid for porting purposes when:
    A. an I-140 is withdrawn before the alien’s I-485 has been pending 180
    B. an I-140 is denied or revoked at any time except when it is revoked based on a withdrawal
    that was submitted after an I-485 has been pending for 180 days.

    I pulled this from the Aytes memo:http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/AC21Intrm122705.pdf

    Unless I'm not construing the above correctly, a withdrawl after 180 days has no impact. The only thing that would be a 'death-knell' is if an RFE is issued which the employer does not respond to.


    withdrawl in that case would be death-knell to your AOS case..
    there is theoretical opening for "approvable" 140 cases in yates memo, but it's more theory than practice, in the world wher USCIS is revoking approved 140s , one can't depend on such a slim glimmer of hope..



    more...

    house hot wwe divas wallpapers. wwe divas maryse hot. Wwe+diva+maryse+hot+pics
  • Wwe+diva+maryse+hot+pics


  • psaxena
    02-04 04:21 PM
    Hi, Everyone says I am in and I am in . no one says how and when.

    So I decided to step up for this. Guys please send the list of the members with contact information who are willing to meet & greet. I'll then plan for some place to get together.

    We are just a few indians in AZ , atleast we should meet and it will be good social networking and also will be a big step forward for the cause that we all are together at this portal.

    All the best, looking forward to meet everyone.




    tattoo WWE Diva Maryse Picture wwe divas maryse hot. diva wallpaper. wwe divas
  • diva wallpaper. wwe divas


  • paragpujara
    04-05 08:11 AM
    Guys,

    Please reply. It's urgent. I have to accept or reject the full time offer in couple of days.

    Your help will be really appreicated.



    more...

    pictures WWE Diva Maryse Ouellet out of wwe divas maryse hot. wwe diva wallpapers. wwe diva
  • wwe diva wallpapers. wwe diva


  • hebron
    06-21 10:58 AM
    Hi Guys,
    Have a question about porting from EB3 to EB2 suing the experience I gained from my current employer. Can I fall back to my existing EB3 application if I file EB2 labor and I-140 and these get denied? Please suggest and I am also not sure if the requirement that job descriptions have to be 50% different cam be met. Software Engineer and Principal software engineer jobs have same SOC and DOT codes.

    Job description when I was hired: (software engineer): Understand client requirements, design, document and develop object-oriented software solutions; debugging and code review, unit tetsing code for all logic and flow, participates in the test review thorugh test review and analysis. Experience require 2-4 years.

    My current job description: (Principal Software engineer): Designs, modifies, develops, writes and implements software programming applications. Coordinates work teams - Provides technical support to project team members and co-ordinate with technical team and Quality assurance team. Provide consultation and expertise in a variety of the field's concepts, practices, and procedures on complex projects. Extensive experience and judgment required to plan and accomplish goals. Experience required is 8-10 years.




    dresses Hot WWE Diva Focus Maryse wwe divas maryse hot. WWE DIVAS MARYSE
  • WWE DIVAS MARYSE


  • small2006
    08-20 02:38 PM
    I gto the same response last week. They were so adamant in denying me the info that I got frustrated and hung up on her.:mad:



    more...

    makeup WWE Diva Maryse Graces the wwe divas maryse hot. hot wwe divas wallpapers.
  • hot wwe divas wallpapers.


  • ita
    01-16 01:38 PM
    I was trying to find out if it is possible to switch from H1-EAD-H1 all the while staying in the country.

    If this switch is possible then will the EAD-H1 switch process be treated as 1 .transfer/ 2.new H1 application(subject to annual quota,lottery)/ 3.something else(recapture)? Though in all the three cases this new H1 will be valid for only whatever time that is left on H1 and not 6 years.

    All these days I thought it would be treated as transfer (though there is a gap between the H1).

    Thank you.



    There is something called as recapturing of lost Days on H1. So for example you were out of USA for some time when you were on H1 you can recapture that period. Try googling "Recapturing of H1".
    This way you will not be part of the New quota. Hope this helps




    girlfriend diva wallpaper. wwe divas wwe divas maryse hot. 2007 WWE Divas | Site Designed
  • 2007 WWE Divas | Site Designed


  • gk_2000
    10-20 10:13 PM
    he is leading his dem candidate by 30 points in one poll

    Hey bhagwan, is budde ko dharthi se tu utha le..

    (Oh almighty, summon this old man away from us)




    hairstyles WWE Diva Maryse Picture - pic wwe divas maryse hot. Did WWE Diva Maryse Ouellet
  • Did WWE Diva Maryse Ouellet


  • Anders �stberg
    June 18th, 2005, 11:18 PM
    On my monitor it looks too grey and washed out... I guess what this shows is there is a big difference in monitors, the printed product is perhaps what counts in the end. I've been thinking of replacing my monitors, they are getting old and I can't get them quite right according to the Eye One calibration software.




    pitha
    05-11 08:48 AM
    If you like your family so much you can always go back, you have a choice, people stuck in EB immigration have no choice they are being kicked out because of the long retrogression. Frankly all this talk about this family based immigration is nonsense. It takes 20 to 30 years for somebody to emmigrate uisng family based immigration. So does that mean that in the 20 to 30 years it takes for the "family" to come here, you dont love them in that time. The point I am trying to make is that all the people who are pumping up this family based immigration are trying to play up the emotional angle and are being hypocrites. If you can live in the US without the "family" for 20 to 30 years, I dont see any reason why they cannot live without the family comming to US at all. Let the "family" come to US on there on merit.

    The point-based system will not be good for this country. Many other countries have point-based systems such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, etc. The most who immigrate in these countries on the point-based system don't have jobs. Only those should be allowed to immigrate who has the job offer here. All the immigration fees and expenses to immigrate should be borne by the employer offering the job.

    Not only this, the people who promote this point-based system are interested in shutting off immgration based on family unification. Why you would not like your own family members to be here, when they all have been allowed until this day to bring their own family members from European countries.




    chanduv23
    02-24 09:27 AM
    Thank you theshiningsun and chanduv23.

    Chanduv23 - You are right. I'm working for a consulting company and the contract is ending.

    I want to clarify little more.

    1. Will I receive NOID, if my employer revokes I140? Can I avoid it by filing AC21 before my existing employer cancels the I140?

    2. Can I travel out of the country without the job? Will it cause any issue at the Port of Entry, if I use AP to enter US (but currently doesn't have the job in hand)?

    Here is the whole meat - I have written about this probably 200 times.

    You may receive NOID - yes - thats how it works. An employer sends a letter to the service center stating that the candidate has moved to a different job so does not want to hold this position and decided to eliminate the position. The officer then processes the request - usually this whole thing happens in 4 to 6 weeks after your employer sends the letter.

    If you already sent a new employment letter from your new or prospective employer - chances are that it may end up in your file or not - we don't know how USCIS works internally. Even if your letter reaches your file, the officer processing your 140 revocation may not physically check your document folder, rather may rely on their online system which may not have any reference to AC21 change in job because AC21 is not a formal process.

    Now, if you sent AC21 letter and it reaches the officer processing your 140 revocation, chances are that the officer may accept it or may want more information in form of an RFE so that the process looks standard, RFE or NOID is almost similar and in case of 140 revocations, they usually send NOID - which means you cannot withdraw your 485 and you have one shot at your 485 by responding to NOID.

    In some cases the officer may send a denial on 485 - the denial will not have any reference to AC21 but clearly states that your 140 was revoked and therefore your 485 got denied. In such cases you have to file for a motion to reopen - this has happened a lot and continue to happen (though we do not see lately because lot of cases have been preadjudicated and not many 485s being filed or not many 140 revocations. Motions take anywhere from weeks to few months and you may need help from Ombudsman's office at times if it is getting delayed. Now when it comes to travel - if you travel when 485 is denied, you cannot come back and file for MTR - it gets complicated.

    AC21 works just fine in most cases and people have navigated smoothly and usually the same or similar job has never been an issue as long as you are doing similar job. technically you don't need copy of labor as long as you know what you are doing. The job duties need not be a photo copy of earlier job but just be similar. Say if you are a .net programmer, you are fine if you are doing Java.

    Good luck and don't panic. Do talk to a lawyer if you want and look for a good job. Fulltime jobs are taking a long time to get because employers are picky in this market with more supply than demand. Don't let your employer know you are looking for fulltime jobs - he may take instant revenge. It is not only consulting companies that we talk about and trash, but any employer looks for their interests - corporate world is greedy and selfish - one must know how to play.

    Also remember, not all lawyers are ethical because it is a business to them and they will do what is in best interest of their business. You need to be smart and tricky. It is painful at times to deal with all the legal stuff when you want to progress, burt work your ways smartly.

    If you want to travel without a job in hand, it is your choice, most times it is smooth, as long as your documents are intact, I think you will be fine, but there is always a risk. I would recommend to find a job and then travel.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment